• Link to Youtube
  • Link to LinkedIn
Stanford Center on Longevity
  • ABOUT
    • GENERAL
      • About SCL
      • Annual Reports
      • Contact
    • PEOPLE
      • Leadership, Scholars & Staff
      • New Map of Life Impact Fellows
      • Faculty Affiliates
      • Advisory Council
      • SCL Ambassadors
    • AFFILIATED CENTERS
      • Stanford Distinguished Careers Institute
      • Glenn Foundation for Medical Research
      • Stanford Lifestyle Medicine
  • RESEARCH & INNOVATION
    • The New Map of Life Initiative
    • Postdoctoral Fellows Program
    • The Futures Project on Education and Learning for Longer Lives
    • The Sightlines Project
    • Longevity Design Challenge
    • Publications
  • MEDIA & EVENTS
    • SCL Magazine
    • Longevity Book Club
    • Century Summit
    • Century Lives Podcast
    • SCL in the News
    • Videos
  • ENGAGEMENT OPPORTUNITIES
    • Press inquiries
    • Postdoctoral Fellowship application
    • Industrial Affiliates Program
    • Stanford Courses
    • Make a gift
  • Click to open the search input field Click to open the search input field Search
  • Menu Menu

How Can Decision Making Be Improved?

Authors: Katherine L. Milkman, University of Pennsylvania; Dolly Chugh, New York University; Max H. Bazerman, Harvard University

Publication: Perspectives on Psychological Science
Year: 2009

Focus Area: Decision making, Prevention

Relevance: While prevention efforts cannot ensure that people make the correct decision, strategies to improve the decision-making process are valuable assets in improving outcomes. When is intuition detrimental and when is it valuable to decision making? Of particular interest in fraud prevention are techniques to address biases that people do not want to admit or believe about themselves.

Summary: Bad decisions are expensive and people want to avoid them, but there has not been enough academic work on strategies to improve decision making.

  • Good decisions are those that the decision maker “would regard as the right choice regardless of whether she was evaluating her own decision or someone else’s.”
  • The authors propose a model of decision making that involves two systems; one, the intuitive, fast, emotional system and two, the deliberate, slow, logical reasoning system.
  • In cases when system one leads to biases that undermines good decision making, strategies to actively incorporate rational thinking can improve outcomes. Alternatively, decision-making situations can be altered to account for emotional biases – especially in situations where people do not want to admit or believe their own biases (i.e. racial bias).

Author Abstract: The optimal moment to address the question of how to improve human decision making has arrived. Thanks to 50 years of research by judgment and decision-making scholars, psychologists have developed a detailed picture of the ways in which human judgment is bounded. This article argues that the time has come to focus attention on the search for strategies that will improve bounded judgment because decision-making errors are costly and are growing more costly, decision makers are receptive, and academic insights are sure to follow from research on improvement. In addition to calling for research on improvement strategies, this article organizes the existing literature pertaining to improvement strategies and highlights promising directions for future research.

Full Article

https://longevity.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/SCL-Logo-1-300x118.png 0 0 admin https://longevity.stanford.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/SCL-Logo-1-300x118.png admin2011-02-04 18:27:422011-02-04 18:27:42How Can Decision Making Be Improved?
 

© Copyright - Stanford Center on Longevity
  • Link to Youtube
  • Link to LinkedIn
Link to: Harnessing Our Inner Angels and Demons: What We Have Learned About Want/Should Conflicts and How That Knowledge Can Help Us Reduce Short-Sighted Decision Making Link to: Harnessing Our Inner Angels and Demons: What We Have Learned About Want/Should Conflicts and How That Knowledge Can Help Us Reduce Short-Sighted Decision Making Harnessing Our Inner Angels and Demons: What We Have Learned About Want/Should... Link to: Impact of Risk Disclosures Through Direct-to-Consumer Advertising on Elderly Consumers’ Behavioral Intent Link to: Impact of Risk Disclosures Through Direct-to-Consumer Advertising on Elderly Consumers’ Behavioral Intent Impact of Risk Disclosures Through Direct-to-Consumer Advertising on Elderly...
Scroll to top Scroll to top Scroll to top